Page 3 of 3

Re:

PostPosted: Wed May 03, 2006 4:04 pm
by perhaps?
Quoting Grandpa from 13:58, 4th Jan 2006
However, the wearing of an academic gown is done for academic tradition. The wearing of a union gown is done for no such academic reason at all, so it seems.


Those well known accademic positions of University Secretary, and Quaester for example?

Re:

PostPosted: Fri May 05, 2006 9:57 pm
by Grandpa
Quoting perhaps? from 13:52, 1st May 2006
Quoting Grandpa from 13:58, 4th Jan 2006
However, the wearing of an academic gown is done for academic tradition. The wearing of a union gown is done for no such academic reason at all, so it seems.


Those well known accademic positions of University Secretary, and Quaester for example?


are they really union gowns?

or university gowns?

who paid for them?

[hr]

We are gentlemen that neither in our hearts nor outward eyes envy the great nor shall the low despise.

Re:

PostPosted: Fri May 05, 2006 10:00 pm
by Al
And you still fail to see the point.

Re:

PostPosted: Sat May 06, 2006 1:56 am
by Spike
in the end...who gives a crap?

Re:

PostPosted: Sat May 06, 2006 8:45 am
by Al
Quoting Spike from 02:56, 6th May 2006
in the end...who gives a crap?


About Association gowns or grandpa's inability to see reason?

Re:

PostPosted: Sat May 06, 2006 12:24 pm
by Spike
you choose

Re:

PostPosted: Sun May 07, 2006 5:15 pm
by Al
I suspect that no one really gives a crap about Association gowns. Most people either like the idea or don't care one way or the other. Only grandpa is kept awake by the very idea of them.

As for his ability to always find new ways to be wrong... What can one say? Actually, quite a lot but he doesn't ever listen.

Re:

PostPosted: Sun May 07, 2006 6:20 pm
by exnihilo
This really is the thread that keeps on giving, an endless source of amusement.

no gowns, no goons, just action...

PostPosted: Fri Oct 13, 2006 8:21 am
by Phil Reid
Ah the union and its incredible ability to discuss gowns, oh how i've missed it.

just as a point the association president wore the black gown with red facing until we had some refurbished/replaced by the after many days, but i can't for the life of me remember if it was dana or marcus who declared they should wear the umc theatre officers gown as it looked better than the presidents gown, you can certainly imagine both of them not wanting to be upstaged. the gown had formally been either union or or src presidents gown i believe, but had developed a big rip across the back. dana definately also wanted us (the vps) to wear unique gowns, which would have been a fine way to waste even more time and effort on something we wore for photoshoots once a year.

Re:

PostPosted: Fri Oct 13, 2006 11:20 am
by exnihilo
Marcus started wearing the red and blue, but do remember that previous presidents had both the black and maroon and the red and maroon in their dual capacity.

Unique VP gowns? As in a different one for each VP? Madness! But, still, only £300 or so, as nothing to what the SRC or UMC could waste in an hour.

Finally - Phil! How are you, old stick?