What? wrote:Woohoo!
Though I'm not sure how successful it'll be at £16 with St Andrews' general apathy towards (good) live music.
Bizarre Atheist wrote:
(And why couldn't Starfields get any real names, if Musfund can manage it?)
What? wrote:Starfields was trying to be entirely self-financing
What? wrote:Bands cost a lot more than DJs for a similar level of fame because you have to pay for far more people - on top of all the members of the band there's the roadies as well. The amount the above 3 cost would probably just about cover Idlewild in my experience of trying to book bands to play in St Andrews.
What? wrote:Scratch Perverts, Bodyrox and Utah Saints are pretty big names if that's the music you like.
James.C. wrote:i personally don't like them but i am posting just purely to say this couldn't have been advertised that well as this is the first time i have heard of it.
James.C. wrote:i personally don't like them but i am posting just purely to say this couldn't have been advertised that well as this is the first time i have heard of it.
James.C. wrote:i personally don't like them but i am posting just purely to say this couldn't have been advertised that well as this is the first time i have heard of it.
was it? probably best not to inquire as to the inner workings of the union on the sinner but wasn't starfields ran by StarFm? aka just another sub-committee like musfund and therefore just as self-financing as musfund are??
Hennessy wrote:I thought you got a grant from the union....
Return to The Sinner's Main Board
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 6 guests