by mattina on Fri Jun 15, 2007 10:47 pm
I usually try to stay out of politics and whatnot but I guess being IV secretary and having held trials, I should answer.
Firstly though, I do get a bit annoyed when people aren't willing to attach names to their comments and stick to what they have said, or in this case, typed. Then again, I've always believed in being held responsible for one's actions.
As for trials, Tom and Miles expressed interest as a team and did say that if there were any difficulties presented that I could cut them and they would understand.
It also came down to needing 4 teams to form a table and when holding trials I wanted to get 4 high quality teams in addition to a high quality judging panel. Connie and Doug where preselected to serve on the panel where they were joined by Tony and Jason. I felt that not having Connie and Doug would interfere with the quality of the decision as 2 judges is too few for trials. The timetabling of trials took in account my being able to coincide it with a visit of a very distinguished Irish speaker who has won several competitions including LSE, Diarmuid, who also was CA of the DCUL IV.
I wanted everyone who expressed interest in trialing to do so and that is exactly what happened.
Rooms in the Union and elsewhere (excluding the Mansfield) are booked through the DoSDA and Lee gave me rooms in various places. As for using Buchanan, I liked it so much I might use it for trials again next year as given lower usage of the rooms generally, when your timeslot is up there isn't a group waiting to kick you out and take over the room, which was nice. It allowed for more flexibility in giving the judges more time if needed to reach their decisions.
Laura