Home

TheSinner.net

Formal Dress Forum

Your opportunity to discuss goings on in the Debating Society, recent debates or any issues you believe are important. Questions or queries can be addressed to the moderator at debates@st-andrews.ac.uk.

Re:

Postby Steveo on Fri Jun 20, 2008 4:34 pm

I'm sure this has been discussed before, but I can't for the life of me find it. Is there any way of fixing a hood so it does not pull constantly on the shirt? I find having to readjust my shirt annoying, and if there is any way of preventing this I'd very much like to own it.

[hr]

Get off my internet.
Get off my internet.
Steveo
 
Posts: 2142
Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2003 2:03 pm

Re:

Postby Jamie potton on Sat Jun 21, 2008 10:30 am

Waistcoat.
Or this "hood stabiliser" thingy.
Jamie potton
 
Posts: 90
Joined: Wed Sep 15, 2004 2:01 pm

Re:

Postby Jos Dad on Sat Jun 21, 2008 1:37 pm

Quoting Steveo from 17:34, 20th Jun 2008
I'm sure this has been discussed before, but I can't for the life of me find it. Is there any way of fixing a hood so it does not pull constantly on the shirt? I find having to readjust my shirt annoying, and if there is any way of preventing this I'd very much like to own it.


I believe women graduands are advised to pin it to their bra. Is this an option?
From the Glory of High fell, unto the despair of life.
Jos Dad
 
Posts: 81
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 12:00 am

Re:

Postby fearghas on Sun Jun 22, 2008 9:39 am

We've been trying to get Steve to wear a bra for a while now, but he keeps resisiting the idea.

Perhaps this will do the trick finally.
fearghas
 
Posts: 27
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 12:31 am

Re:

Postby Al on Sun Jun 22, 2008 11:28 am

Quoting fearghas from 10:39, 22nd Jun 2008
We've been trying to get Steve to wear a bra for a while now, but he keeps resisiting the idea.


You just need to find the right reward. A pot or two of jam should do the trick.
Al
 
Posts: 3992
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 12:00 am

Re:

Postby Dave the Explosive Newt on Tue Jun 24, 2008 6:01 pm

Is there a technical term for gown+hood worn over an ordinary suit and tie? Or does one still count it as academic dress even though one is not in sub fusc?

[hr]

Mmmmmmm, cake.
http://standrews.facebook.com/profile.php?id=37102114
Dave the Explosive Newt
 
Posts: 1470
Joined: Thu May 19, 2005 3:29 pm
Location: Cambridge

Re:

Postby J.C.H. on Fri Jun 27, 2008 10:03 am

Quoting Steveo from 17:34, 20th Jun 2008
I'm sure this has been discussed before, but I can't for the life of me find it. Is there any way of fixing a hood so it does not pull constantly on the shirt? I find having to readjust my shirt annoying, and if there is any way of preventing this I'd very much like to own it.


Simple - don't fasten it to your shirt (the loop on the neckband is only for fixing to to a sb cassock.)

If the hood is worn correctly, with the neckband close around the throat, the hood stays in place and doesn't choke.
J.C.H.
 

Re:

Postby Anon. on Sun Aug 10, 2008 7:08 pm

What sort of headgear can one wear with a kilt? Does it have to be something like a Balmoral or a Glengarry, or are things like flat caps allowed? What would one wear with evening dress?
Anon.
 
Posts: 2779
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 12:00 am

Re:

Postby Anon. on Sun Aug 10, 2008 7:10 pm

Also...

What are people's thoughts on black shoes with a blazer? I wear them myself (grey trousers, navy blazer), but always have a sneaking suspicion that it's strictly speaking a gaffe and only brown shoes should be worn with a blazer.
Anon.
 
Posts: 2779
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 12:00 am

Re:

Postby Mr Comedy on Wed Aug 13, 2008 10:46 am

I think if it makes you feel good, go for it. I've got no major objections to black shoes with a blazer, as long as it is a dark shade of navy. If it was a lighter colour I'd point you in the direction of brown shoes.

[hr]

"I am in no way interested in immortality, but only in the taste of tea. " -Lu Tung
"I am in no way interested in immortality, but only in the taste of tea. " -Lu Tung
Mr Comedy
 
Posts: 2922
Joined: Sun Mar 16, 2003 5:43 pm

Re:

Postby Anon. on Wed Aug 13, 2008 7:09 pm

Quoting Mr Comedy from 11:46, 13th Aug 2008
I think if it makes you feel good, go for it.


People just going for what makes them feel good is not good. That way striped ties with check shirts lie.

I've got no major objections to black shoes with a blazer, as long as it is a dark shade of navy. If it was a lighter colour I'd point you in the direction of brown shoes.


Surely the shade of the trousers is more important?
Anon.
 
Posts: 2779
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 12:00 am

Tartans

Postby james-crittenden-cavendis on Fri Aug 15, 2008 6:00 am

Dear all,
My name is James Crittenden-Cavendish. I am coming in as a bejant this September and am wondering what the feeling about town is about tartans. Evidently, it is my right to wear the Gordon, Gunn, McDonald, Lindsay, and Fraser tartans, and of course the blackwatch and stuart tartans, however, what is the feeling toward wearing tartans to which you are not, by writ or lineage, strictly entitled to.
Thank you,
James Stuart
일...년...더..
james-crittenden-cavendis
 
Posts: 3
Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2008 8:38 am

Re:

Postby Anon. on Sat Aug 16, 2008 4:23 pm

As tartans are a sign of affiliation then I suppose you can wear the tartan of whatever clan/name/organisation to which you wish to show affiliation.

There are the following restrictions:

Only the Royal Family and others with permission (e.g. some regiments) may wear the Royal Stewart tartan. This is often flouted.

Only the Royal Family may wear the Balmoral tartan.

Only the Prince of Wales may wear the Lord of the Isles tartan. I think I remember a story of the Prince of Wales visiting the then Bosvile MacDonald of Sleat baronet (the family were previously called MacDonald of the Isles) and raising his eyebrows when he saw that his host was wearing "his" (HRH's) tartan.
Anon.
 
Posts: 2779
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 12:00 am

Re:

Postby Al on Sat Aug 16, 2008 10:01 pm

That's not strictly true. A clan tartan is a sign of allegiance not affiliation. Wearing a clan tartan is a sign that you bear allegiance to the head of that clan. Furthermore, a person can only be a member of one clan at any one time. Therefore one should wear the tartan that is appropriate for the clan to which you belong. If your surname is not one which is recognised as a clan or a sept then you should wear a district tartan.
Al
 
Posts: 3992
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 12:00 am

Re:

Postby Anon. on Mon Aug 18, 2008 11:31 am

I disagree. Clan tartans as they are known today were not even codified until the nineteenth century, after the demise of the clan system. The idea of "allegiance" to anyone other than The Queen is defunct.
Anon.
 
Posts: 2779
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 12:00 am

Re:

Postby Eliot Wilson on Mon Aug 18, 2008 12:34 pm

I think I side with Anon. on this one. In any case, as the modern tartan system is largely made up, it's inappropriate (not to mention anachronistic) to get excessively worked up about who wears what. I happen to wear my father's tartan, but I'd just as happily wear my mother's, and, in any case, "clans" were rather loosely defined.

[hr]

Bill and Ted beat the Grim Reaper at Twister

Bill: "You played very well, Death, especially with your totally heavy Death robes."

Death: "Don't patronise me."
Bill and Ted beat the Grim Reaper at Twister

Bill: "You played very well, Death, especially with your totally heavy Death robes."

Death: "Don't patronise me."
Eliot Wilson
 
Posts: 2138
Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2002 11:09 am

Re:

Postby Al on Mon Aug 18, 2008 1:02 pm

Well, maybe. But I think I'll side with the Lord Lyon.

"There are no strict rules on who has the right to wear a particular tartan. People normally wear only the tartan (if any) of their surname, or a "district tartan" connected with where they live or where their family come from.

Wearing a particular clan tartan indicates that the wearer bears an allegiance to the chief of that clan."
Al
 
Posts: 3992
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 12:00 am

What not to wear to a white tie event

Postby Anon. on Tue Oct 21, 2008 3:50 pm

Image

An ill-fitting coat, a soft-fronted shirt, what looks suspiciously like a made-up tie, and (gasp) no waistcoat!

The blighters either side with their ties riding up their collars and shirts bulging out beneath their waistcoats look positively elegant by comparison.
Anon.
 
Posts: 2779
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 12:00 am

Re: Formal Dress Forum

Postby Eliot Wilson on Wed Oct 22, 2008 10:57 am

It's terrible, isn't it? I blame the current incumbent for making such a song and dance when he had to don white tie for a state banquet at Buckingham Palace, saying he'd rather wear a dinner jacket and his cowboy boots with the presidential seal on them.
Bill and Ted beat the Grim Reaper at Twister

Bill: "You played very well, Death, especially with your totally heavy Death robes."

Death: "Don't patronise me."
Eliot Wilson
 
Posts: 2138
Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2002 11:09 am

Re: Formal Dress Forum

Postby exnihilo on Fri Oct 24, 2008 7:33 am

But then our own Dear Leader, showing himself a man of the people, has declined to wear white tie as well, presumably in the dangerously moronic belief that black tie is somehow less fustian and more proletarian.

I should like to assure you all, here and now, and publicly, that when (and if) I attain any high office I shall make an absolute point of donning all and any attire that is appropriate to it at every bloody chance I get. This I solemnly swear (or affirm).
exnihilo
 
Posts: 4999
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 12:00 am

PreviousNext

Return to Union Debating Society

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

cron