by James Baster on Wed Nov 13, 2002 10:04 am
I too glower and growl for the flippant way prothet said that, but he is actually right. And so is Farwall. Mostly.
I would also add that Comp Sci isnt for everyone in more ways than one. To be a good comp sci you have to have a very logical and also literal mind. You also have to be creative, and yes, I'm sure many arts students will scoff at this but yes, creative. In Physics or Maths when they give you a question there is generally one way and one way only to do it. You use formula X. In comp sci, when you write a computer program there are many many different ways to do it. You need skills to logically weight up several approachs and decide what the best one is. This gets even worse when you start doing your year long practicals when you have 15 people all round a table, each of you with your own ideas for the best approach. And yes, when you get it working well it is satisfing. (Quick Litimous test: if you laughted at me and Farwall saying that, then dont even bother trying comp sci.) Programming is not just sitting there typing, it is a real art. If you enjoy it, it is truley satisfying.
So as well as really liking it, you have to have the right mind for it or you will struggle. And you do have to actually be intrested in it, or again, you will struggle. Dont just jump into it. Find someone to teach you some programming one night to see if its for you, and beware that not everyone is a good teacher. Thats especially true in comp sci, where most people are shy and not very good at explaining things.
[hr][s]Its nice to be able to blaspheme. It takes a very special and strong-minded kind of atheist to jump up and down with their hand clasped under their other armpit and shout 'Oh, random-flucuations-in-the-space-time-continuum!' or 'Aaargh, primitive-and-out-moded-concept on a crutch!' - Terry Pratchet, Men at arms[/s]