by Aureliano on Thu May 06, 2004 1:37 pm
[s]quarterstaff wrote on 13:49, 6th May 2004:
american culture?
for a country thats only about 250 years old you guys think you have culture that can be compared to europe or asia?
Now, now. I'm all for the occasional America bashing, but you should consider equality here. Who's mentioned comparisons here, and why should we try to quantitatively compare European/Asian/American culture, as you say? I will lash out myself with the old "only existed for 250 years" argument, but only if Americans try to assume a superior culture/society. This is not the case here.
To me, Carolyn's been simply talking about the universal difficulty of living in close proximity to someone of 'a different culture', and how that can lead to problems in translating and understanding one another. From her perspective and experience, it's British culture that is stubborn and mocking of her heritage. This could be equally true of a Britain living in America, with the Yanks not willing to understand separate taps for hot/cold water etc.
Yes, modern American society can be argued to be an over-rated, modern amalgamation of the world's heritage, mixed with modern day consumerism & hotdogs & McWorld. And yet Gershwin sounds just as beautiful as Wagner. Society and cultural differences will always be mocked, but don't forget your own biases. Australian aboriginal society has hardly changed since the Stone Age, and yet we will not attack its relevance. Especially as an anthropologist, I will argue that the passing of time can create 'deeper/more complex' cultures, but generally speaking not more meaningful or superior ones.
So just watch it!