by Dardar on Fri Feb 23, 2007 7:37 pm
Hello again! So – I’ll answer your questions one by one.
Bizarre Atheist – Nobody has ever said I’m their hero. Ever.
Munchingfoo – The solar panels idea was put forward by the Environmental and Ethics Committee, and is something the University is strongly supportive of because they have recently been given a lot of money to come up with environmental projects. The chances are the University would cough up the money for them, and we would then have to pay less on our (rocketing) electricity bill. As such we would be able to give more money to societies (or at least that is how I see it).
The rainwater harvesting idea came from Bruce Turner, and is something he has been thinking about for some time. I like it too. It makes a lot of sense and would work well.
How will all this work be done? Well… it is impossible for us to completely demolish the entire building and start again from scratch. The University simply cannot afford it, and neither can we. As an example, the library is having the same problems now… and when work begins on that it will be as an expansion of the current site rather than a total demolition.
It is, therefore, far more likely to be an extension of the current site – probably backwards onto the garden, and possibly upwards. It is also feasible that there will be some sort of panelling attached to the front of the building to give it the appearance of a new, more attractive, area. That said, there is still plenty of scope to demolish half of the building (venue 1), and redevelop and expand that from scratch. There is also the option of not expanding the building outwards at all, but to internally redevelop the whole site to make far better use of what we have.
Regardless of which option we go for, our aim will be to complete the vast majority of the work over the summer to make it ‘workable’ when the students arrive… with the rest of the work being completed by Christmas. We do not envisage moving out of the Union for a year to create the New Union – although it might be ‘messy’ for a bit.
Frank – It is the Students’ Association to campaign on your behalf for the University to build us some ‘good accommodation’. Our plans include changes to how we will do representation, although successes this year include ensuring all hall prices will not increase over the next three years except with inflation, and a commitment from the University that future accommodation builds and will be as affordable for student as possible. We have achieved numerous other things on this front this year, thanks largely to the efforts of Laura Wilson and Ben Nicholson. Should you wish to know more, I recommend you contact them.
Lazerquest was discussed but rejected – we just don’t have the space for it. That said, it would have been good. Oh, it would have been so good. But paintball… Oh, wow.
David – It would be much appreciated if you could have a look at it, and let me know what you think.
Telinar – Beatons is a very interesting point. The chef, Charlie, is excellent – and better than nearly everyone employed in the University Catering department. He produces the cheapest food in town, but can also produce (if given appropriate resources) some fantastic food. The coffee, tea and soft drinks are the cheapest in town. So why don’t more people use it? Well, most don’t know about it, and it’s tucked away at the back of the main bar.
We envisage the New Union to have far better use of the front of the building. We would hope that the area to the left of BESS (looking from the pavement) where the recycling area is would become the new entrance to Beatons. There would be outside seating, and a door into a completely refurbished café where the Publications Office/Old Laundry exists. This would then catch far more people in off the street, and be a very useful source of income. It would also just be a far nicer environment. There is also the possibility that where Beatons currently sells food from a bottle bar would be developed to cut down the waiting times for beers and other stuff.
Jequirity – More so than a permanent Star Wars theme?
Box of Delights – Lots of good points. I should perhaps before I answer your question explain briefly what is going to happen. The plan (should be accepted in the referendum on the 16th March) sets out what the Students’ Association needs to contain. Next year it will be the job of the sabbaticals and staff to create a series of two or three ‘options appraisals’ for exactly how all of the things set out into the plan can be put into our ‘new’ building (with an extension if need be). As such – I cannot give you any definite answers for what will happen, but having spoken to the other sabbaticals, lots of student and staff, the responses listed below illustrate current thinking – and where we would have to go if the building was to be changed tomorrow:
B.E.S.S does need expanding – especially if wish to sell sports merchandise from there as well (as the plan states). The problem is that it needs the front space of the building, and so, consequently, has very little place to ‘move into’. That said, we might be able to find space for their storage of clothes somewhere else in the building, and so be able to expand into the cupboards which currently exist. It’s a problem – but we’re working on it.
General Office – It is ludicrous for any building to have a reception right in the heart of the building. It is currently planned that the New Union will have a reception area at the front of the building – but all of the other services which the office provides (photocopying, printing, binding, laminating etc) will be turned into a ‘photoshop/reprographics’ unit, which will concentrate on doing just those facilities. We might even consider moving all stationary out of BESS to make more space for cards and clothes, and into said ‘photoshop’ (although this is just a thought – I’m not saying that this will happen at all).
SSS – As it stands, we can’t see SSS being made into one compact space – although I agree that it would be useful, and just because I can’t see it doesn’t mean it is going to happen. When we make the options appraisals for the building, then it is certainly conceivable that we will clump them together, in the same way that we hope to clump our representational facilities together. I am due to discuss the plan at a meeting with Student Support on the 27th and will ask if they would prefer to be clumped together in the redesign of the estate, and, if they say yes, I will try to work that in.
Car Park – a tricky one, as it is never going to be very big, but has to hold the cars of the staff who work here. There might well be an access road to the back of the Union put in, however, which would help by allowing stage materials to be taken straight from the street to the back of Venue 1 (or possibly a new Venue 3). Not sure I can say much on this, except you’re right.
Venue 1 – Main Bar Passage – Has been recognised as a problem, and will be addressed if there is any internal redevelopment of the foyer area (which is very likely). Gridlocked is a great word to describe it – there are more crashes there than on the M25.
AI – No comment
MacMan – The problem with the Union building is that times of usage are set into a system of peaks and troughs… when we are busy, we are packed… and when we are quiet, we are empty. Mornings and early afternoons are VERY quiet, as most of you guys and gals are at lectures. In the evenings, however, we are so packed we cannot fit all of our 97 societies in. That is why you have the debates society training out of the snooker room, and thespians acting in the corridor. Lee Kane and I have been working on this for months now – the solution is simple. We allow the University to use our rooms for teaching in when they are empty in the mornings, and in exchange they let us have their rooms which lie empty in the evenings for society usage. This deal has worked very well for us – we are now allowed to use the Buchanan on Monday, Tuesday and Thursday nights at no cost to ourselves (despite porters and utilities costs adding up to about £65 a night), while they have yet to put anyone in any of our rooms! Ultimately we would like to see the debates society get hold of Lower Parliament Hall ‘for free’, Mermaids given a good home (or two), and musicians given ample room to practice. At present, we simply cannot find the space for any of these things in the evenings when they are needed, and that is why we need either a) a massive New Union (not going to happen), or b) to continue working with the University to find the space we are so short of. All of this said, there is plenty of scope for better usage of the space which we have/
As for the junk – well, one mans junk is another man’s treasure. We cannot afford to go out and buy all of the things which we would like (sofas, carpet, Hugh MacDougall), so we make do with what we have… and the students use everything which is within the building.
Refurb – undoubtedly. We are currently getting a new ceiling put on (hence the work you will see with the giant red bucket tube), and this will help with the damp, but the whole building looks really dated.
As for drinks prices and quality… I don’t think we do that badly. Let’s start with price. I phoned up every single Students’ Association in Scotland earlier to find out just how much they charge for their drinks.
Institutions Price for cheapest beer (pint) Price for shot of vodka
Aberdeen 1.80 1.50
Abertay 1.60 1.00
Dundee 0.99 0.99
Edinburgh 1.50 1.50
Glasgow 1.65 1.10
Heriot Watt 1.80 1.60 (w/ mixer)
Napier 1.50 330ml Stella 1.40
QMU 1.75 1.20
Stirling 1.90 1.00
St Andrews 1.60 1.00
It was really interesting, but I don’t think we do too badly out of it. We have held our price of lager for three years now, while our vodka is as cheap as anywhere. There is one interesting point to note, and that is why don’t we do special offers – like buy one get one free, or a happy hour? Well, quite simply, we’re a charity, and we are not allowed to be seen encouraging ‘irresponsible drinking’. One or two other Union’s do, but they are breaking the law… simple as. For the same reason, we are not allowed to lower our prices much more than we currently do – and they are the cheapest in town (if you exclude special offers). We have, however, made a commitment in our plan to keep our prices as low as possible.
As for the quality of drinks – well, like most Students’ Association’s in Scotland, we buy our drinks through a consortium called Northern Services. That means we all actually have pretty much the same stuff as everywhere else (Edinburgh excluded). We have 12 types of beer and lager, which competes with most places in town:
1) Tennants (and extra cold)
2) Stella (and in bottles)
3) Tennants Velvet
4) Tennants Versa
5) Guinness (and extra cold)
6) Staropramen (and in bottles which are much better, in my opinion)
There are also bottles of :
7) Tiger
8) Corona
9) Newcastle Brown
10) Ossian
11) Lia Fail
12) Brahma
I had a chat with Sandy (the bar manager) about it, and he said in the old days they had as many as 20 types of beer and ale and things on tap… but students just didn’t buy it. At the end of the day I guess market economics told. That said, if you can think of a beer or ale or anything you think we should be selling, please get in contact with us, and I will pass the message on. You’d be surprised at how helpful they are…
Ljrmorgan – I used to think just like you! Finances are available from the office, but I’ve hunted them down. Last year our bars made £408431 gross surplus, and £243714 operating surplus. The bop is £3.50, and we budget for selling 500 bands – so we hope to make a minimum of £1,750 each week on that. Sometimes we don’t, but usually we do.
So – where does that money go? Well, the first thing to say is that we are a charity. We do not make money. Every penny you spend in our bar goes back into student societies, activities or representation – or pays for something else like general wages or utilities (which are nearly £100,000 a year). We don’t make anything. In fact, this year we have budgeted to make a loss of £1350. In fact it will probably by a little more than that. But because we have such a wide and varied set of operations, very little of the money made at the bop or on the bars goes on improving those services. Our strategic plan is being created to help change that – and to ensure that our commercial services are ‘updated’ so that they are able to keep up with the demands placed on them from the student body.
Ljrmorgan and dunqn – Ahh, the live music debate. Well, I think it would be fair to say that different students want different things. Some want live music, others want cheese. Some want hip hop, others want RnB. I want the theme tune to Last of the Mohicans (so I stand alone!) One thing we can agree on is that we have only got one very average venue, which means we can only do one thing in it a night. The problem is, everybody wants it. Some for theatre, others for comedy, others for meetings, others for RnB, others for Hip Hop, others for live music… so we do our best to cater for all of them, but sometimes we just can’t because we’re not big enough. Why? Because the Union was built in 1973 for a student population of 3000, and now there are 7000. The solution is another venue – Venue 3 – which will allow us to do twice the number of things we are currently doing, and double the amount of people we cater for. Keep the Bop, but have live music as well.
As for attracting big name bands – well, they cost money. And we simply don’t have it, because we invest all of our money in societies and our other activities. The University doesn’t bankroll us, as happens at other institutions, and, in fact, we are given a smaller grant from our University than any other Students’ Association in Scotland. Take a moderately big star. Say, KT Tunstall. Even though she is from St Andrews she is asking for £20,000 for an hour show. Would you pay £30 to see that in the bop? Would 666 other people? It won’t happen – and we’re not out to just throw money away. We have to at least break even from our commercial services.
That said, I would be happy to try to include in the plan some sort of point along the lines of – ‘to try to attract a big name artist to St Andrews each year in liaison with the University’. Let me know what you think.
Dunqn – When will it be done by… the most key question of all. Well, we need the University to pay for the majority of it. And they will. The problem is they have their priorities (rightly, in my opinion) on other things. A new library, redevelopment of certain schools and halls and a new Medical Sciences building are all ahead of us in the queue for cash. As it stands, it will probably be the summer of 2010 or 2011 – but I hope that doesn’t put you off taking an interest. The University has been begging for a plan like this for years – and it is the only way the Union will ever change. We are closer to actually achieving it than at any time in our history, despite 17 years of wanting it.
…
Right, well, I’ve now written nearly 3,000 words on this which probably makes me, if nothing else, the saddest President ever. Friday night, 7.30. I’m off for a pint. Keep the comments/questions/abuse coming…