Home

Freaker wrote:

Thomas Schratwieser wrote:...because, if there's a female footballer who is good enough to get on a men's team...

Ouch.

I chose arbitrary genders; my apologies for any offense as it was not my intention. It has been amended.

Saying this, I don't see why this should bar the KK from renting out university property, which is something that seems to have been suggested will happen, though I'm not certain that the original email either confirmed or denied. I would criticise it from this point, as it was quite vague in what ...

However, I think we must be careful about making a general principle on this matter. The KK’s membership criteria is a fairly clear cut matter of exclusion. However, there are a lot of clubs which fall into a grey area where criteria-based membership applies. The single-sex sports clubs are relevan...

I'm ambivalent in regards to the Kate Kennedy Club, but this is the wrong way to go about promoting equality and reducing our elitist image. If the telegraph is to be believed the KKC will no longer be permitted to use University property for their wicked ways, but what about other single-sex societ...

Brian's right, Melissa. You really should avoid using such objective words in describing purely subjective creations. To say that something is "the best", and "the biggest" usually requires proof (like budget statements, ticket sales records, etc).