Lattesometime? wrote:DACrowe....i don't know where to start. Maybe by asking if you have any friends? The structure of your responses is emabarrassingly academic for a blog website. Please chill out a little. I get the impression you take this all very seriously. Maybe I should. Maybe I don't take it seriously enough. Then again this response, coming from a structuralist perspective means that any cognitive...............sorry I fell asleep there.
I look forward to your 10,000 word reply. Be careful referencing,I will be checking. Don't forget turnitin....
Wow. For someone advocating 'chilled-out-ness' you seem to have a serious stick up your ass. I'm sorry if my answering a forum (not a blog) question semi-seriously offended or 'embarrassed' you in any way. I didn't realise I was supposed to be writing for your benefit, I thought I was doing it for my own amusement.
Lattesometime? elsewhere wrote:'wonder' boy. i 'wonder' if you came up with that name yourself? is it ironic?
Lattesometime? elsewhere wrote:Alex, "get involved" is disgustingly generic st andrews lexicon i'm afraid. do you also enjoy "cheeky" pints? and "schweffing"? or are you a "quaffer"? "epic banter"?
Guess you're an equal opportunities offender.
This is taking things too seriously:
http://edition.cnn.com/2010/SHOWBIZ/TV/ ... index.html I was just having a bit of fun. Get off of my cloud.