The Rules of Drunken debauchary

[Maisha]

Ok, I assume that there must be rules for this (as there seems to be rules for everything else!) But I somehow have managed to misinterpret them :s
Right, I assumed that whatever you did while terribly drunk with another terribly drunk person was just classed as drunken fun.
(Granted this doesnt really count if it involves cheating on another party.)
However I am a little confused how I went from harmless fooling around with a friend to suddenly being an item!?
How did that happen?!? I thought only girls were meant to sometimes jump to such conclusions?!
This also happened with another friend when the guy she'd met a week ago suddenly started introducing her as his girlfriend?!?!
What the hell is going on!? Does this mean you cant be naughty under the influence unless you want to wake up with another half?


[hr]Artificial intelligence is no match for natural stupidity

[munchingfoo]

I think guys who do that are totally crazy and should be put right immediately. If you actually like them put it tactfully, else just tell them, "stop fucking telling people I'm your girlfriend you fuckin crazy troll"

[David]

alternatively you could just not jump into bed with someone after a few drinks and avoid the sitation completely

[David Bean]

I stand by what I said in September: a gentleman always leaves before breakfast, so that he can bring it to the lady in bed.

[hr]"Fiat justicia ruat colelum (Let justice be done though the heavens may fall)" - Judge James Horton (family motto)

[Guest]

[s]David Bean wrote on 15:40, 6th Nov 2004:
I stand by what I said in September: a gentleman always leaves before breakfast, so that he can bring it to the lady in bed.


And how does this apply to a woman who sleeps with guys when drunk thus fooling them into thinking they care about them?

I don't quite see the connection.

[Iveagh]

Women are just difficult to predict. It is as simple and straight forward as that. Men are always, yes always, the bad guys.

[hr]'You can discover more about a person in an hour of play than in a year of conversation.'

Plato

[David Bean]

[s]Unregisted User wrote on 15:57, 6th Nov 2004:

And how does this apply to a woman who sleeps with guys when drunk thus fooling them into thinking they care about them?

I don't quite see the connection.


I don't remember claiming there was one.

[hr]
"Fiat justicia ruat colelum (Let justice be done though the heavens may fall)" - Judge James Horton (family motto)

[Guest]

[s]David Bean wrote on 21:06, 6th Nov 2004:
I don't remember claiming there was one.


I just assumed you would wish to be relevant to the thread in order to make sense rather than just rambling. My bad.

[LonelyPilgrim]

Hrm... Who initiated? My immediate thought is that a guy is perfectly willing to have a fooling around/booty call/friends-with-benefits relationship if it's his idea, but if the girl comes on to him, he'll immediately make something more of it.

After all, girls aren't supposed to be into that whole casual thing, so if she wants to sleep with him, there must be more to it than that. Which is rubish of course, but it's what society trains us to think. Men = horrible evil pigs. Women = sweet and innocent and all emotional and that.

Really, though, the status of any relationship or lack of relationship is best sorted out before jump in the sack, so as to avoid things like this.

[Manic23]

[s]Unregisted User wrote on 22:14, 6th Nov 2004:


I just assumed you would wish to be relevant to the thread in order to make sense rather than just rambling. My bad.


Since when has making relevant posts been a prerequisite of writing on the sinner? 99.9% of people here (myself included) talk pure shite anyway, so why should it be relevant shite?

[munchingfoo]

63.9% of statics are made up on the spot!

Did you know that the Emu doesn't fly south for the winter?

[thePontificator]

There are no rules to drunken debauchery, you're either debauched or you're not, and the being drunk is very much up to you.

Also what are the arrangements if you're gay? Who gets who the breakfast? Do you really want to reinforce who the dominant one is in the relationship that early? And what if you wake up next to someone you know to be a complete and total bitch? Or Jules?

[Rufus]

The rules are: do not get drunk. Or if you do, smear four week old canine faecal matter on your nether regions prior to going out.
The sad fact is, if you don't want a relationship, don't allow yourself to get into any 'compromising situations'.
There are too many desperate, lonely men out there.

I'd rather forego an extra glass of sweet joy-giving nectar than wind up with four weeks of trying to shoo away a keen little man.

[Thackary]

[s]Manic23 wrote on 00:24, 10th Nov 2004:
Since when has making relevant posts been a prerequisite of writing on the sinner? 99.9% of people here (myself included) talk pure shite anyway, so why should it be relevant shite?


Are you suggesting that there are 4 people on the boards who DON'T talk pure shite?

[quarterstaff]

[s]Rufus wrote on 15:20, 10th Nov 2004:
The rules are: do not get drunk. Or if you do, smear four week old canine faecal matter on your nether regions prior to going out.
The sad fact is, if you don't want a relationship, don't allow yourself to get into any 'compromising situations'.
There are too many desperate, lonely men out there.

I'd rather forego an extra glass of sweet joy-giving nectar than wind up with four weeks of trying to shoo away a keen little man.




lol... or any number of months. lol

[Tweedle-Dum]

[s]thePontificator wrote on 14:06, 10th Nov 2004:
And what if you wake up next to ... Jules?




Luckily, that situation does not often arise.