by David Bean on Sun Jul 31, 2005 10:18 pm
As a classical liberal/libertarian, my result was:
Overall: 45% Conservative, 55% Liberal
Social Issues: 50% Conservative, 50% Liberal
Personal Responsibility: 25% Conservative, 75% Liberal
Fiscal Issues: 100% Conservative, 0% Liberal
Ethics: 25% Conservative, 75% Liberal
Defense and Crime: 25% Conservative, 75% Liberal
Which is pretty random, really, and indicative of the slants that people have already identified. Although, you can identify some patterns - the 100% Conservative (sic) on fiscal issues is one, as is the 100% Liberalon ethics, defence and crime. I'm not exactly sure which the social questions were that tipped the balance 50/50, but I have a feeling they're confusing basically economic issues such as welfare provision (really a question of who should look after the unfortunate, not whether they should be looked after at all) with properly social ones like whether or not people should be free to have an abortion if they choose.
For the record, questions on the Iraq war, the US justice system, international law and (to some extent) the death penalty shouldn't have anything to do with something that was really interested in discerning the correspondant's political philosophy. Sadly, this test is basically populist, and designed to shoehorn people's views into the pernicious bipartisan American view of politics. I'm not impressed.
[hr]
"Don't ask me what you know is true, don't have to tell you, I love your precious heart. I - I was standing, you were there, two worlds collided, and they could never tear us apart" - INXS
Psalm 91:7