/begin rant
Quoting Al from 21:21, 7th Aug 2001
However, it chooses to organise events within the university and wider community and promotes itself as some sort of keeper of university traditions. None of the things the KK does are dependent on it being men only. If it wants to remain an all male club, fine - they should give up their social/community role. If they won't to this then they should admit women.
I never thought I'd be rushing to the defence of the KKC, but this passage is simply illogical. You admit that what the KKC does isn't dependent on the basis that they are all male (a fraternity in the purist sense of the word). Why, then, must they admit women if they choose to put on social functions?
You can draw analogies to the House of Commons until you're blue in the face: There is a fundamental flaw with that argument too. The Commons is a
constitutionally designated body of government put in place to serve and represent the people. The Kate Kennedy Club is a fraternity who have put
themselves in charge of upholding traditions. Why should they let anyone besides whom they choose in the club?
Quoting Emma from 10:21, 8th Aug 2001 But we cannot recreate the KK. Separate is not equal.
I need some clarification-are you saying that an all-female society couldn't be created to be as popular as the KKC? Because that seems to assume that when the KKC was invented it was instantly an institution. For lack of a better word, that's stupid. The Kate Kennedy Club got to where it is today through time.
The amount of clout you bestow on the KKC is up to you. Ignore them, follow your own traditions, throw your own balls, make your own damn club, whatever. They aren't official to the Uni or the town, it's just a bunch of students.
I think feminism is a great thing. I'm a solid believer in psychology and biology and I don't believe that there are no differences between the sexes- I
know it to be true. I admit that women have to fight a lot of the time to get equal treatment and to challenge the notion that you have less potential, shit I dare say that as a sufferer of LD I can sympathize. But the arguments above aren't feminist, they're sensationalist. Consider "Diamond Car Insurance". If you create a company or a society that serves only to women, no one so much as bats an eyelid. Diamond even base they're ad campaigns on bad-mouthing men. Do the same with a male society, and people can't scream 'oppression' fast enough.
/end rant
[hr]
http://standrews.thefacebook.com/profil ... 71d2255dff
The Sinner: Where no one ever learned "if you haven't got any thing nice to say, don't say anything at all."