Home

TheSinner.net

The Strafford Club

This message board is for discussing anything in any way remotely connected with St Andrews, the University or just anything you want. Welcome!

Re:

Postby Eliot Wilson on Wed Jun 22, 2005 9:21 am

Marxists don't get drunk; they aren't interesting enough. Say what you like about them, but Tories are usually the most fun.

[hr]

Bill and Ted beat the Grim Reaper at Twister

Bill: "You played very well, Death, especially with your totally heavy Death robes."

Death: "Don't patronise me."
Bill and Ted beat the Grim Reaper at Twister

Bill: "You played very well, Death, especially with your totally heavy Death robes."

Death: "Don't patronise me."
Eliot Wilson
 
Posts: 2138
Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2002 11:09 am

Re:

Postby Prophet Tenebrae on Wed Jun 22, 2005 12:00 pm

Is 1892 still a society? I thought it had fizzled to nothing?

One things for sure though - debates about the KK and their role/importance/inherent evil/abomination to all that is left and liberal seem now to be as deeply engrained a tradition as the KK itself.

[hr]

IMAGE:www.btinternet.com/~brother.war/white10-2.gif
Prophet Tenebrae
 

Re:

Postby Lady Macbeth on Tue Oct 18, 2005 1:36 pm

Quoting Anonymous from 11:06, 8th Aug 2001
Is the Westoun society still running, it seems even more interesting as no one knows anything about it and yet you still bump into a couple of people who have said they went to one...


The Westoun Society has always been there, always will. JUst not necessarily always in St. Andrews.
You don't find it, it finds you.
Lady Macbeth
 

Re:

Postby Will on Tue Oct 18, 2005 1:40 pm

Far as I know 1892 has gone the way of the Dodo (quite rightfully so) and went kapoof.
Will
 

Re:

Postby DrAlex on Tue Oct 18, 2005 2:25 pm

/begin rant
Quoting Al from 21:21, 7th Aug 2001
However, it chooses to organise events within the university and wider community and promotes itself as some sort of keeper of university traditions. None of the things the KK does are dependent on it being men only. If it wants to remain an all male club, fine - they should give up their social/community role. If they won't to this then they should admit women.


I never thought I'd be rushing to the defence of the KKC, but this passage is simply illogical. You admit that what the KKC does isn't dependent on the basis that they are all male (a fraternity in the purist sense of the word). Why, then, must they admit women if they choose to put on social functions?

You can draw analogies to the House of Commons until you're blue in the face: There is a fundamental flaw with that argument too. The Commons is a constitutionally designated body of government put in place to serve and represent the people. The Kate Kennedy Club is a fraternity who have put themselves in charge of upholding traditions. Why should they let anyone besides whom they choose in the club?

Quoting Emma from 10:21, 8th Aug 2001 But we cannot recreate the KK. Separate is not equal.


I need some clarification-are you saying that an all-female society couldn't be created to be as popular as the KKC? Because that seems to assume that when the KKC was invented it was instantly an institution. For lack of a better word, that's stupid. The Kate Kennedy Club got to where it is today through time.

The amount of clout you bestow on the KKC is up to you. Ignore them, follow your own traditions, throw your own balls, make your own damn club, whatever. They aren't official to the Uni or the town, it's just a bunch of students.

I think feminism is a great thing. I'm a solid believer in psychology and biology and I don't believe that there are no differences between the sexes- I know it to be true. I admit that women have to fight a lot of the time to get equal treatment and to challenge the notion that you have less potential, shit I dare say that as a sufferer of LD I can sympathize. But the arguments above aren't feminist, they're sensationalist. Consider "Diamond Car Insurance". If you create a company or a society that serves only to women, no one so much as bats an eyelid. Diamond even base they're ad campaigns on bad-mouthing men. Do the same with a male society, and people can't scream 'oppression' fast enough.
/end rant

[hr]

http://standrews.thefacebook.com/profil ... 71d2255dff
The Sinner: Where no one ever learned "if you haven't got any thing nice to say, don't say anything at all."
DrAlex
 
Posts: 2201
Joined: Tue Nov 30, 2004 9:40 pm

Re:

Postby exnihilo on Tue Oct 18, 2005 3:35 pm

Why in the name of all that's reasonable has this antediluvian thread been revived?
exnihilo
 
Posts: 4999
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 12:00 am

Re:

Postby novium on Wed Apr 26, 2006 4:22 am

i have no idea.
Neither the storms of crisis, nor the breezes of ambition could ever divert him, either by hope or by fear, from the course that he had chosen
novium
User avatar
 
Posts: 2646
Joined: Tue Sep 21, 2004 10:04 pm

Re:

Postby Irish Frank on Wed Apr 26, 2006 8:28 am

what is 1892? This sounds interesting.
Irish Frank
 
Posts: 185
Joined: Wed Nov 24, 2004 1:11 am

Re:

Postby Wakka Wakka on Wed Apr 26, 2006 11:11 am

Quoting exnihilo from 16:35, 18th Oct 2005
Why in the name of all that's reasonable has this antediluvian thread been revived?


Because the left-wing nutjobs need to be continually reminded that nobody cares what they think.
Wakka Wakka
 

Re:

Postby thebrookster on Wed Apr 26, 2006 11:34 am

Three Cheers to DrAlex!! Summed up in beautiful form. I far as I know, which is about 3mm, the KK are based on tradition, and traditionally the KK were male, as was this University. So as far as I can see, they are upholding tradition.

On a lighter note, anyone else wondered why there is such a 'who-ha' over letting women into the Infantry. For some unknown reason the Armed Forces have said No. As far as I am concerned, anyone who is foolish enough to want to go to the front line with a high chance of being killed in war should be allowed!
thebrookster
 
Posts: 237
Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2005 1:18 am

Re:

Postby Grandpa on Wed Apr 26, 2006 12:05 pm

Quoting Anonymous from 19:27, 4th Aug 2001
Could somebody tell me if the Strafford Club still exists at St.Andrews.


I've never been, as yet, but understanmd the Strafford Club to be a monarchically supporting club. A better idea for a club I could not have.

Long live anybody Royal.

Raaaaah.

[hr]

We are gentlemen that neither in our hearts nor outward eyes envy the great nor shall the low despise.
We are gentlemen that neither in our hearts nor outward eyes envy the great nor shall the low despise.
Grandpa
 
Posts: 773
Joined: Mon Dec 27, 2004 3:42 am

Re:

Postby Irish Frank on Wed Apr 26, 2006 12:07 pm

could anybody clarify what the 1892 club is?
Irish Frank
 
Posts: 185
Joined: Wed Nov 24, 2004 1:11 am

Re:

Postby exnihilo on Wed Apr 26, 2006 1:19 pm

The Strafford Club is a private, formal, gentlemen's dining club; membership by invitation only and subject to black-balling. It is dedicated to the principle of monarchy. It meets roughly six times per year and is modelled on a similar institution at Cambridge, it has ties both to that institution and to the Constitutional Monarchy Association, though is affiliated to neither. It was founded in 1995 on Feb 6th.

The 1892 Society was founded to oppose the KK and was so named as 1892 was the year in which female students were first admitted.
exnihilo
 
Posts: 4999
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 12:00 am

Re:

Postby ja242 on Wed Apr 26, 2006 1:20 pm

For those interested in the Strafford Club

http://standrews.facebook.com/group.php?gid=2201941422

There's even an entry on Wikipedia.


Quoting Irish Frank from 13:07, 26th Apr 2006
could anybody clarify what the 1892 club is?
ja242
 
Posts: 19
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:23 pm

Re:

Postby Poindexter on Fri Sep 14, 2007 11:51 am

[b] It was founded in 1995 on Feb 6th.


Re-founded my man, re-founded.
Poindexter
 
Posts: 36
Joined: Sun Aug 22, 2004 12:39 am

Re:

Postby [James] on Fri Sep 14, 2007 12:06 pm

Oh Christ.
[James]
 
Posts: 413
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 12:00 am

Re:

Postby exnihilo on Fri Sep 14, 2007 12:31 pm

Erm? Why has this come back?? But, as it has....

No, definitely founded. I know, I did it.
exnihilo
 
Posts: 4999
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 12:00 am

Re:

Postby Jono on Sat Sep 15, 2007 2:25 am

Wow! I was two pages into this one before I realised how old it was!

Just goes to show really. "The Sinner: Same old shit, just on a different night!"

[hr]

BY FIRE; BE PURGED!


http://www.myspace.com/tauntra
Now some people weren't happy about the content of that last post. And we can't have someone not happy. Not on the internet.
Jono
Moderator

User avatar
 
Posts: 1252
Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2005 9:44 pm

Re:

Postby Bizarre Atheist on Sat Sep 15, 2007 9:16 am

Quoting Jono from 03:25, 15th Sep 2007
Wow! I was two pages into this one before I realised how old it was!

Just goes to show really. "The Sinner: Same old shit, just on a different night!"

[hr]

BY FIRE; BE PURGED!


http://www.myspace.com/tauntra


You will write 1000 times 'I must not quote Nickleback song lyrics on The Sinner'

[hr]

Image
You wouldn't steal a handbag. You wouldn't steal a car. You wouldn't steal a containership full of tanks. Piracy is a crime, do not accept it.
Bizarre Atheist
User avatar
 
Posts: 853
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 6:45 pm

Re:

Postby Jono on Sun Sep 16, 2007 2:47 am

little did the teacher realise that Copy and Paste have somewhat diminished the effeciveness of lines.

I'd always write lines out word by word.

[hr]

BY FIRE; BE PURGED!


http://www.myspace.com/tauntra
Now some people weren't happy about the content of that last post. And we can't have someone not happy. Not on the internet.
Jono
Moderator

User avatar
 
Posts: 1252
Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2005 9:44 pm

Previous

Return to The Sinner's Main Board

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 64 guests