by LonelyPilgrim on Mon Jun 09, 2008 6:00 am
Okay, several points:
1) Doctor Who airs in the US at 9pm eastern time on the Sci-Fi Channel: RIGHT BEFORE Battlestar Galactica, during prime time on the best night of the week. Evidently the decision-makers at Sci-Fi consider it quite capable of standing up to BSG (SG: Atlantis, too, which also has a Friday night slot, albeit during a different season).
2) Why all this "Why can't British television make good Sci-Fi like that American show BSG" nonsense? Sky One was and, as far as I know, still is a major partner in BSG. That's why the episodes for the first seasons aired in the UK BEFORE the US. All told, I believe there are four networks providing money and resources to make BSG: NBC, Sky One, Sci-Fi, and some Canadian network the name of which escapes me at the moment. Point being, if it looks better, is written better, and is acted better, it's probably because it has four times the resources (at least) behind it and is the result of serious industry collaboration - not because it's 'American sci-fi.'
3. The sillyness of Dr. Who turns me off, too, but I wouldn't say it's a bad or inferior show. The production values are decent, especially considering the challenge of a new set and supporting cast every episode (as was mentioned above). Clearly enough people enjoy it to make it a considerable success both in the UK and the US. Why not just leave each to their own?
[hr]
Man is free; yet we must not suppose that he is at liberty to do everything he pleases, for he becomes a slave the moment he allows his actions to be ruled by passion. --Giacomo Casanova
Man is free; yet we must not suppose that he is at liberty to do everything he pleases, for he becomes a slave the moment he allows his actions to be ruled by passion. --Giacomo Casanova