by Rob Hearn on Wed Mar 02, 2005 3:09 pm
I'm not going to respond to individuals, but make some general remarks. Some people seem to think it's okay for there to be animosity between England and Scotland because in previous centuries there have been wars, human rights violations, and so on. This is utter crap. To paraphrase Dawkins, the tendency to carry vendetta across generations is one of the two major diseases of the human mind. The other, I think, is to generalise across nations.
Many English people are of course responsible for exactly the same kind of behaviour. As I said, the self-satisfied mood in England after the world cup was appalling. I hate that people take credit for sporting victories despite contributing nothing towards it and gleaning no material benefits. None of the twats who stood cheering that obscene parade in london had any right to take pride in the achievements of the wholly seperate men sitting on the bus. I dislike cheering at national sports in any form. The negative, cheering at the opponents of a different country's team kind of behaviour is just worse, whomever it is perpetrating the act, Scottish, English, Irish, or Venutian.
Nevertheless, I think the problem is worse is Scotland than in England. I'm not going to dig up statistics, but that's my intuition. There's quite simply more and bitterer animosity travelling from Scotland towards England than in the reverse direction, and more of a general sense that it's okay to feel that way.
As I said, it's terrible to generalise across nations. What this means in practice is that there's no reason to think that just because you're Scottish I'm talking about you. I'm Scottish, and I'm certainly not talking about me. I'm talking about the guy who started the thread, and all of those who have subsequently argued that there's some justification for Scots to cheer on England's rivals at every opportunity.
"I've done a lot of things I'm not proud of. And the things I am proud of, are disgusting."