What? wrote:Starfields was trying to be entirely self-financing
was it? probably best not to inquire as to the inner workings of the union on the sinner but wasn't starfields ran by StarFm? aka just another sub-committee like musfund and therefore just as self-financing as musfund are??
What? wrote:Bands cost a lot more than DJs for a similar level of fame because you have to pay for far more people - on top of all the members of the band there's the roadies as well. The amount the above 3 cost would probably just about cover Idlewild in my experience of trying to book bands to play in St Andrews.
And I believe on a small scale it's budgeted per-person-who-needs-paying but on a larger scale it's per-"how many people will come"....acts will still want a considerable percentage of the profits no matter how many members.
I'm sorry to have to tell you but....musfund are just cool. Possibly cooler than Star....what can i say? Musfund is just infact awesome. sorry starfields. get over it, move out of the way, go pack your bags, musfund is better than you....nah nah nah nah nah....
xAlice
[STARFM TAKE NOTE - IM KIDDING, I THOUGHT STARFIELDS WAS AWESOME AND "What?" IS RIGHT THAT....
What? wrote:Scratch Perverts, Bodyrox and Utah Saints are pretty big names if that's the music you like.