"displays utter contempt for the Christian faith"
Well aint that a shame.
Why not try and charge them with blasphemy in an Irish court? I eagerly await a test case.
"No, I don't think any of this should be banned, but it also shouldn't have been done in the first place."
What's the difference? Either something can be done, or it can't. You wouldn't, I presume, wish to legislate against something purely on the grounds that it displays contempt for a 2,000 year old death cult, therefore you would necessarily have to accept that people can do such things and, if they so wish, should be able to do so? You wouldn't want to stop them would you?
"What low-quality people EA employs."
And therein lies the extent of your power. Boycott them, speak out against them, tell them to fuck off. But don't pretend they
shouldn't do something merely because it is not to your tastes.
There was a great piece on the Guardian today about something similar (should islam4uk be allowed to march?)
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree ... ree-speechCouldn't agree more with the sentiment.