by James on Mon May 19, 2003 11:36 am
[s]Pilmour Boy wrote on 12:14, 19th May 2003:
[s]kensson wrote on 12:07, 19th May 2003:[i]
[s]Neferet wrote on 12:04, 18th May 2003:[i]
Alfie, where Sue had had "had had," had had "had"; "had had" had had the teacher's approval.
Bravo! I was thinking this morning, you could contrive even longer ones by talking about this sentence:
Alfie, where Sue had had "had had 'had had'", had had "had 'had had'". "Had had 'had had'" had had the teacher's approval.
That's fifteen, and you could (if you were sufficiently perverse) keep adding 'had had's four at a time until you ran out of space on the internet.
Also, the anagram answer no-one got: "Drop suggestible wanker here" is an anagram of "President George Walker Bush". Aptly.
[/i]
But surely there you're running into problems with tense. If they had written it, they would still have it.
[hr]
One of the penalties for refusing to participate in politics is that you end up being governed by your inferiors. - Plato
[/i]
Could they have both written, respectively, "had had" and "had" and then altered their words? So Sue had had "had had", but had changed it to something else, and Alfie, writing a similar sentence, had had "had", but had also altered it. Maybe each altered it to say what the other said, maybe they each changed itt o something entirely different, but it is possible.