Home

TheSinner.net

Mobile Phones

This message board is for discussing anything in any way remotely connected with St Andrews, the University or just anything you want. Welcome!

Mobile Phones

Postby rubbermuffin on Fri Jul 18, 2003 1:26 pm

Hi I'm thinking of changing my phone and was wondering about the reception of different networks in st andrews. I'm on o2 which is fine, I know Orange is crap, but what about the others? Is anyone on T-mobile? They seem to have the best offers going.

[hr]'I said I wasn't blaming Jesus or anything. It wasn't His fault that He didn't have any time.'
'If something has to change then it always does'
rubbermuffin
 
Posts: 593
Joined: Sun Nov 10, 2002 1:36 am

Re:

Postby mossop on Fri Jul 18, 2003 1:41 pm

I'm on T-mobile, and it's ok although you can't get a reception in most of the pubs, which can be a problem! I'm going to switch back to Orange though, I got a great reception in St Andrews on orange.

[hr]Mossop - http://www.fortunecity.com/lavender/tom ... ddlers.htm
24 hours in a day, 24 beers in a crate. Coincidence? I think not.
mossop
 
Posts: 829
Joined: Wed Dec 04, 2002 10:07 am

Re:

Postby Colin on Fri Jul 18, 2003 1:45 pm

I'm on T-Mobile. It sucks. No reception in any pub or any of the places I am most likely to be (hall, physics building, the union, the pubs). Decidedly ropey signal on streets in town too - depends what side of the street you are on and what the weather is doing.

Dont do it.
Colin
 
Posts: 628
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 12:00 am

Re:

Postby Sarah on Fri Jul 18, 2003 2:51 pm

My T-mobile seemed okay in most places, except for just one house in Gatty for some reason. Library, school of English, union - these places were fine.
Sarah
 
Posts: 25
Joined: Mon Sep 09, 2002 3:49 pm

Re:

Postby Pussycat on Fri Jul 18, 2003 3:39 pm

O2 is one of the best around for reception in Scotland. It has the best coverage so is more likely to work in more remote areas.

Their deals are very good too, especially if you are more of a texter.
Pussycat
 
Posts: 994
Joined: Thu Nov 28, 2002 8:36 pm

Re:

Postby PurelySynthetic on Fri Jul 18, 2003 3:47 pm

id chose o2 coz 500 free texts a month is hard to beat!
ive had both o2 and orange and have stuck to o2 now as the deals are a lot better and the reception works better if you're further out of town ie up by safeway coz orange only worked every now and again for me up there.
PurelySynthetic
 
Posts: 363
Joined: Wed May 21, 2003 9:57 pm

Re:

Postby Pussycat on Fri Jul 18, 2003 3:54 pm

On O2 you can get 500 free texts per month at £15 line rental (I think) or there's good old pay-as-you-go where you pay a minimum of £10 a month for calltime to get 300 free texts a month. The benefit of the latter being that when you don't use your phone as much you can skip payments, yay :)
Pussycat
 
Posts: 994
Joined: Thu Nov 28, 2002 8:36 pm

Re:

Postby Foolish Pedant on Fri Jul 18, 2003 4:05 pm

Pay as you go, with a minimum monthly payment?

Sounds a bit like a contract to me...
Foolish Pedant
 
Posts: 50
Joined: Tue May 20, 2003 6:55 pm

Re:

Postby Pussycat on Fri Jul 18, 2003 4:07 pm

The minimum monthly payment is to keep up the free text allowance, has nothing to do with being able to make calls. And like I said you don't have to make the payments if you don't want to - that's why its called....pay-as-you-go.
Pussycat
 
Posts: 994
Joined: Thu Nov 28, 2002 8:36 pm

Re:

Postby PurelySynthetic on Fri Jul 18, 2003 4:08 pm

You only have to put the minimum tenner a month in if you want the 300 free texts. Otherwise you just pay (i think) the 10p for the texts u send. So depending how much you text - a tenner for 300 or 10 p each its ur choice!
PurelySynthetic
 
Posts: 363
Joined: Wed May 21, 2003 9:57 pm

Re:

Postby PurelySynthetic on Fri Jul 18, 2003 4:09 pm

"snap"
PurelySynthetic
 
Posts: 363
Joined: Wed May 21, 2003 9:57 pm

Re:

Postby Lyeta on Sat Jul 19, 2003 12:22 pm

Im on Virgin mobile (pretty good value) but not worth it because reception is crap everywhere in St. Andrews (with the exception of East Sands) and the top-up cards arent in as many shops as others. Most people I know say o2 is the best.
Lyeta
 

Re:

Postby Foolish Pedant on Sun Jul 20, 2003 1:48 pm

So you're paying for stuff that's free?
Sounds very odd to me.
Foolish Pedant
 
Posts: 50
Joined: Tue May 20, 2003 6:55 pm

Re:

Postby Rennie on Sun Jul 20, 2003 3:01 pm

No, Foolish Pedant, the deal is(AFAIK):

You have to put a minimum of £10 a month into your o2 phone, and then you receive £10 of call credit, plus 300 free texts. It doesn't actually "cost" £10 for the texts, they just come as a kind of bonus.

And yes, o2 are the best reception in St Andrews and the surrounding areas, with vodafone a close second. The rest are terrible. Vodafone and o2 must share masts, I assume.
Rennie
 
Posts: 855
Joined: Tue Jan 28, 2003 1:51 pm

Re:

Postby Pussycat on Sun Jul 20, 2003 3:15 pm

Yup and now that it has been explained three times by three different people perhaps you understand. Pay-as-you-go with an optional benefit of 300 free texts - more than most people would ever need.
Pussycat
 
Posts: 994
Joined: Thu Nov 28, 2002 8:36 pm

Re:

Postby Pussycat on Sun Jul 20, 2003 3:23 pm

And yeah, while many companies do share masts O2 and Vodafone seem particularly keen to team up in Scotland. O2 have the best coverage overall but Vodafone is now a close second even in the Highlands.
Pussycat
 
Posts: 994
Joined: Thu Nov 28, 2002 8:36 pm

Re:

Postby rubbermuffin on Sun Jul 20, 2003 4:38 pm

Wow cheers for all the responses, I've decided to stick with o2 and get a fab nokia 3650 for video and picture madness!

[hr]'I said I wasn't blaming Jesus or anything. It wasn't His fault that He didn't have any time.'
'If something has to change then it always does'
rubbermuffin
 
Posts: 593
Joined: Sun Nov 10, 2002 1:36 am

Re:

Postby Thackary on Sun Jul 20, 2003 6:46 pm

Why not term it "inclusive" texts, rather than free.

If someone doesn't understand something, it's more likely to be the fault of the person explaining.
Thackary
 
Posts: 3034
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 12:00 am

Re:

Postby Al on Sun Jul 20, 2003 7:08 pm

Quite.

[hr]Rompiendo la monotonia del tiempo
Al
 
Posts: 3992
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 12:00 am

Re:

Postby Neferet on Sun Jul 20, 2003 8:07 pm

[s]Thackary wrote on 19:46, 20th Jul 2003:
If someone doesn't understand something, it's more likely to be the fault of the person explaining.


All three of them? All explained quite well I thought inspite of some pedantic questions.
Neferet
 
Posts: 187
Joined: Sat May 17, 2003 2:07 pm

Next

Return to The Sinner's Main Board

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 46 guests