http://www.channel4.com/news/2003/12/we ... iller.html
I promise I wont make a habit of this, but found the analysis made just after General Clarke's quote quite interesting. Beforehand I was all for Iraqi's trying Saddam as it would be the biggest sign of a new beginning and Iraq controlling themselves. However, seeing as there still in the middle of writing the constitution and laws etc it would leave the process up to bias with the knowledge that the trying of their former president would be the first to experience these new laws. And after reading this article, I'd love to see the world's leading powers being taught a lesson (not just America), if Saddam's lawyer was to call upon key figures as the above article suggests, the removal of saddam would signal both new peace in the middle-east, and give world powers the kick up the a*se they need! (Can you tell I've had a radicalist lecturer all semester?)
[hr]..I've got this pain down all the diodes on my left side...