by Sir Tufton Bufton on Tue Aug 24, 2004 5:42 pm
[s]Unregisted User wrote on 13:40, 23rd Aug 2004:
Does the uni really have debt or is it just bluffing it?
Claiming twenty-five million pounds of debt that doesn't exist would be a good way for the university's bankers, administrators and auditors to have a little vacation at her majesty's pleasure. I think you can safely assume the debt is real.
In response to the poster further up: you are correct. Looking at the university's accounts shows short term debt of about 14M and long term debt of 27M. Nearly all of this latter number is in the form of a bank loan most of which is not due to be repaid for *at least* five years. Also bear in mind that the short term debt includes things like prepayments - in other words, not a debt in the true sense of the word, but rather an accounting convention. Nearly half of the debt is in this category. Immediate debt, like for example the university's overdraft, is a more reasonable 4M.
On the other side of the ledger, assets (aside from land and buildings) include endowment funds of around 34M (though like all endowments, their use is restricted), as well as a reserve of around 16M.
All of which is a roundabout way of disagreeing with the OP - St A's debts, while large, are controllable.
Remember also that universities in general are not paragons of financial management. They often lag behind the corporate world in upgrading their accounting standards and practices. Even wealthy institutions are vulnerable. Cambridge wasted nine million pounds on a new computer system that didn't work, but still refused to amend their rules of governance so such things wouldn't happen again.
Universities have been forced to become more prudent, especially in the last few years. I think it's much harder for British ones, since the government expects them to magically find space for a zillion more students without having their funding increased. With that in mind, I think St A's is doing a pretty good job. From the 2003 accounts:
"Financially, 2002/2003 has been a year of change. The University has focussed on building upon its recent academic successes and has begun to develop a culture of financial management which will support further academic development. Investment in both academic and residential infrastructure also reflects the University’s intention to provide the robust support needed to deliver its ambitious primary objectives."
- William Berry, Senior Governor
Of course, it will be interesting to see what the university plans to do with the proceeds from the sale of Hamilton Hall.