by Rennie on Wed Mar 31, 2004 3:43 pm
Well, the Aquarium doesn't have Old Course pirces, you're correct. It's even more expensive. The decking on the outside leading to Catch is unsafe and has been known to crack during balls, people have complained about the bar staff being obnoxious - which I also found to be true on experience - the staffing costs are high, along with rental costs.
If you are solely renting the aquarium because it holds 220 people, then this is a stupid idea. Firstly, at that capacity it would be crowded and unpleasent, and secondly, it is clear from a number of replies on this thread that people wish to have more than 1 ticket. We all know that everyone issued with a ticket is unlikely to go, so I would say at an estimate that you will get around 40-60% of students actually going (and the ones that were fined I assume will not be given a ticket - if so then this is extremely unfair) You will end up either with a half empty, expensive Aquarium ball, or a packed one. Either way, people will compain. I recommend holding the ball at one of the various hotels (which offer cheaper rental cost than the Aquarium) and then subsidise the bar with the savings made on rental and decorating the place.
Also, I was lead to believe that the money form the fines was not actually going to the Committee, but was going to the University Cash Office - as it is a University debt. This makes the fining idea which happened- you will have a lot of pissed off students who now do not wish to return to DRA and the committee didn't even financially benefit from it.
If you wanted the subs so badly, then a face to face meeting should have been tried rather than a simple letter system, which people are going to always ignore. After the fines had been threatened people would much rather pay a reduced amount of subs (say £30 - because they have missed the first ball) rather than paying £50 - and the Committee would have had an extra £30 from each person fined to put towards events.