Quoting from 01:54, 10th Jun 2006
doesnt that depend on whether you are going into honours, are in honours, or are graduating.
I feel very sorry for those graduating with less than a 2.1, I did - I had a great CV apart from a 2.2 only know with a year in work have i recovered and only through work exp due to connections.
A 2.2 screws you, you simply wont get a graduate job with a 2.2, most will end up with deadend jobs for 20k or jobs with a future for 10k. A 2.1 with no work exp isnt great either. for help i had work exp with multi national organisations abroad at a very senior level highly relevant to the sector i wanted to work in.
A 2.1 is what you need. Believe me a 2.2 is a failure that makes the difference between a wicked job in london with mates or job in london with no spare cash or a job in the provinces earning a pittance - you can of course earn more if you are prepared to take a job and earn 20 to 30k for the rest of your life - bear in mind that 20k will get you a mortgage for 60k if you lay down a 10 to 20 % deposit - so not a great place for a graduate to be. Get a 2.1 and you can motor - can emphasise that enough.
That's the biggest load of horse shit I've ever heard. I graduated last year with a 2.2 in Geography, and I have a quality job on sigificantly more money than that in the City. My career has not been harmed in any way by getting a 2.2. I was also involved in all kinds of stuff at uni - I had a whole page on what I had done as well as my degree, which powered me through the interview process. Yeah, if you want to work for McKinsey or some banks you'll never go anywhere with a 2.2, and some companies will only employ 2.1/1st class candidates, but this is not the rule. I don't believe that I would earn more now or later in my career with a 2.1 or a 1st class.
[hr]
"I am in no way interested in immortality, but only in the taste of tea. " -Lu Tung

