Home

TheSinner.net

Formal Dress Forum

Your opportunity to discuss goings on in the Debating Society, recent debates or any issues you believe are important. Questions or queries can be addressed to the moderator at debates@st-andrews.ac.uk.

Re:

Postby Guest on Wed Jun 21, 2006 10:36 pm

Quoting Anon. from 17:08, 18th Jun 2006
[What do you mean by "sloping lapels"? Don't all lapels slope?


Indeed they do. But some have a steeper slope than others, and it was to these that I was alluding; clumsily, admittedly.

If a morning coat is thought of as a cut-away coat (I think they are called cutaways on the continent?), then some appear to be three button cut away and others two.

A standard waistcoat parallels the cut of the former and not the latter.

Oh, and the lack of evening waistcoat off-the-peg is a lamentable state of affairs.
Guest
 

Re:

Postby J.C.H. on Wed Jun 21, 2006 10:36 pm

Quoting Anon. from 17:30, 21st Jun 2006
I think I get you - you're referring to where the two sides of the jacket meet in the middle - around mid-sternum or lower-ribs?


It's called the 'gorge'.
J.C.H.
 

Re:

Postby exnihilo on Thu Jun 22, 2006 8:16 am

Quoting Jason Dunn from 22:44, 21st Jun 2006Finally, and then I really will shut up and stop twaddling on, this picture illustrates, in my opinion, the very neatest three-peice cut.
http://www.mysuitshop.com/images/shop/10871.jpg


You jest, surely? Neatest if you're Peewee Herman, perhaps.
exnihilo
 
Posts: 4999
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 12:00 am

Re:

Postby Bryn on Thu Jun 22, 2006 1:43 pm

Well I found what I was looking for in Picadilly arcade... a shop called Favourbrook. It's very nice, but it was very expensive.
Bryn
 
Posts: 781
Joined: Mon Sep 22, 2003 3:04 pm

Re:

Postby Anon. on Fri Jun 23, 2006 1:38 pm

Quoting Jason Dunn from 22:44, 21st Jun 2006
The picture below shows a fairly low-cut waistcoat which closely matches the cut of the coat:
http://blacktiephilly.com/greycutaway.shtml


That looks terrible. Far too low. Can you imagine wearing a waistcoat like that with an ordinary long tie?
Anon.
 
Posts: 2779
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 12:00 am

Re:

Postby Tweedle-Dum on Sat Jul 01, 2006 12:12 pm

I'm looking for a nice smart/casual Jacket for wearing mostly in the summer, and will be in Glasgow tomorrow. Where's the best place to look?

Also, I don't want to spend more than £100, preferably less.

[hr]

Tetragrammaton is a four letter word.
Tetragrammaton is a four letter word.
Tweedle-Dum
 
Posts: 965
Joined: Sat May 22, 2004 3:24 pm

Shoes

Postby Mr Comedy on Mon Jul 03, 2006 7:23 pm

Quick one chaps.

I have a rather spiffy new pair of shoes, although the bottom of them seems to be vanishing rather quickly. Some wag has suggested that I get my new shoes resoled - how would one go about this?
What are the advantages?
Does this ruin how the shoes look?

Your thoughts would be greatly appreciated.

[hr]

"I am in no way interested in immortality, but only in the taste of tea. " -Lu Tung
"I am in no way interested in immortality, but only in the taste of tea. " -Lu Tung
Mr Comedy
 
Posts: 2922
Joined: Sun Mar 16, 2003 5:43 pm

Re:

Postby Madge on Mon Jul 03, 2006 11:57 pm

If you are goingto dicsuss formal dresses then PLEASE discuss this site.

http://www.ohcouture.co.uk
Madge
 

Re:

Postby Lid on Tue Jul 04, 2006 1:18 am

Briefly, with shoes: Although I've never had any shoes resoled myself, my father has, and a good cobbler can do wonders. There's quite a few cobblers around my town, I suppose only word of mouth can pass on a reputation though.

The shoes that have been re-soled came back looking just as ever they did before, thus the advantage is it saves buying a new pair of shoes, being far cheaper.

I should get my formal shoes re-soled at some point, I fear a nasty fall onto the rocks is in order during a winter pier walk if I don't get my cobbler to put something a bit more grippy than just leather on the sole!

With regards the site... ermm. Fantastic. Only 11 months to go until it launches, I guess? :P Also do note that formal dress hints at the dresswear of both sexes. Although, dresses are rarely discussed, oweing to the fact that most posters here are male, we wouldn't want to come across pervy now, would we! Maybe if we are going to discuss formal dresses, suggest a topic for us to discuss. Maybe the ladies that must read this will come out of the woodwork.


Edited to correct appauling [sic?] grammar
[hr]

We are not drunks, we are multi-millionaires
Mathematical Anti Telharsic Harfatum Septomin
Lid
 
Posts: 1079
Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2005 11:59 pm
Location: Luxembourg

Re:

Postby exnihilo on Tue Jul 04, 2006 8:28 am

There was a brief foray into female dress some thousands of posts back and, as I recall, it was the female posters who asked to move it back onto male dress.
exnihilo
 
Posts: 4999
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 12:00 am

Re:

Postby exnihilo on Tue Jul 04, 2006 10:47 pm

I wonder if it would be wholly out of place to extend this formal dress discussion to what might broadly be termed gentleman's accessories?

I should like to know people's position on cigarette cases, specifically ones with built in lighters (of an antique nature). Thoughts?
exnihilo
 
Posts: 4999
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 12:00 am

Re:

Postby Mr Comedy on Tue Jul 04, 2006 10:55 pm

I've always been of the opinion that a nice silver one with a built in lighter can look rather stylish, although there is a tendency for such devices to make you look like a twat with an outsized lighter.
My personal preference would be for a slimline cigarette case, and a matching lighter, preferably in leather with gold trim. That'd be nice. Not that I smoke of course, but such accoutrements might make the whole thing worthwhile.

[hr]

"I am in no way interested in immortality, but only in the taste of tea. " -Lu Tung
"I am in no way interested in immortality, but only in the taste of tea. " -Lu Tung
Mr Comedy
 
Posts: 2922
Joined: Sun Mar 16, 2003 5:43 pm

Re:

Postby exnihilo on Tue Jul 04, 2006 10:58 pm

That is almost entirely my thinking. Of course, when I do smoke, I smoke old fashioned, filterless cigarettes, so I want an old case that's the right size for Senior Service and their ilk. I think the lighter and case combo would be better, but does lead to thieving gypos making off with one's lighter (which seems to keep happening).
exnihilo
 
Posts: 4999
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 12:00 am

Re:

Postby Jason Dunn on Wed Jul 05, 2006 5:55 pm

Quoting exnihilo from 23:58, 4th Jul 2006
That is almost entirely my thinking. Of course, when I do smoke, I smoke old fashioned, filterless cigarettes, so I want an old case that's the right size for Senior Service and their ilk. I think the lighter and case combo would be better, but does lead to thieving gypos making off with one's lighter (which seems to keep happening).


Have you considered a Vesta case full of matches? I believe such is the proper attachement to the double-Albert watch chain. Indeed any type of sturdy chain should make "theiving gypos" reconsider their intention to pilfer from you.
Jason Dunn
 
Posts: 211
Joined: Fri Nov 05, 2004 2:47 pm

Re:

Postby exnihilo on Wed Jul 05, 2006 6:20 pm

I have both a vesta case and a gambler's pencil adorning the end of my watch chains, the end without the watch, that is.
exnihilo
 
Posts: 4999
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 12:00 am

Re:

Postby Al on Wed Jul 05, 2006 10:55 pm

It's not just the "thieving gypos" you have to watch. The new Earl of Lonsdale has been known to pilfer the odd lighter in his time.
Al
 
Posts: 3992
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 12:00 am

Re:

Postby exnihilo on Thu Jul 06, 2006 9:32 am

I was using the term in its broadest sense, if the Earl nicked my lighter I should consider him to be a thieving gypo as well. Interestingly, though, the biggest culprit over the years was Nick Bibby, but he never seems to have a lighter either, so someone must then steal them from him. I begin to wonder if there's some sort of national lighter shortage...
exnihilo
 
Posts: 4999
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 12:00 am

Re:

Postby Anon. on Thu Jul 06, 2006 11:21 am

Should lighter-stealers be renamed "thieving Zippos"?
Anon.
 
Posts: 2779
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 12:00 am

Re:

Postby exnihilo on Thu Jul 06, 2006 11:39 am

It was only a matter of time, I suppose.
exnihilo
 
Posts: 4999
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 12:00 am

Re:

Postby Eliot Wilson on Fri Jul 28, 2006 7:21 pm

Quoting exnihilo from 10:32, 6th Jul 2006
I was using the term in its broadest sense, if the Earl nicked my lighter I should consider him to be a thieving gypo as well. Interestingly, though, the biggest culprit over the years was Nick Bibby, but he never seems to have a lighter either, so someone must then steal them from him. I begin to wonder if there's some sort of national lighter shortage...


It's entirely possible that Mr Bibby was peddling them to person or persons unknown for Guinness money.

[hr]

Bill and Ted beat the Grim Reaper at Twister

Bill: "You played very well, Death, especially with your totally heavy Death robes."

Death: "Don't patronise me."
Bill and Ted beat the Grim Reaper at Twister

Bill: "You played very well, Death, especially with your totally heavy Death robes."

Death: "Don't patronise me."
Eliot Wilson
 
Posts: 2138
Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2002 11:09 am

PreviousNext

Return to Union Debating Society

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests